[CLOSED] RadioGroup issue with BoxLabel being set on the back end

[zfreeman]

I have the following RadioGroup on the front end:

<ext:RadioGroup ID="rgDeadline" runat="server" FieldLabel="Deadline" ColumnsNumber="1" AutomaticGrouping="false"  MarginSpec="10 0 0 0">                            
                            <Items>
                                <ext:Radio ID="rdSubsequent" runat="server" Name="rating" Checked="true" Handler="#{dcCustomDate}.enable();" /> 
                                <ext:Radio ID="rdCustom" runat="server" Name="rating" BoxLabel="Custom Date" Handler="#{dcCustomDate}.disable();" />
                                <ext:DateField ID="dcCustomDate" AllowBlank="false" runat="server" Disabled="true" OnDirectChange="dcCustomDate_Changed" />
                            </Items>
                        </ext:RadioGroup>

And on the back end I set the BoxLabel for rdSubsequent as follows:

var tBll = new TermBLL();
Term term = tBll.getSecondSubsequentTerm();
rdSubsequent.BoxLabel = " End of Second Subsequent Term (" + term.Description + " Quarter)";

This works fine in 2.5.3 but after upgrading to 3.2 the line above where I set the BoxLabel causes the whole window not to show. I couldn't find anything in the breaking changes or changelog about changes to the RadioGroup or Radio features but was there a change to how you set the BoxLabel?

[zfreeman]

I changed the BoxLabel to FieldLabel and the same functionality works. The only difference is that the label is to the left of the radio button instead of to the right. This works in the instance I am using it but may not for others.

[fabricio.murta]

Hello @Zfreeman!

If you change your rdSubsequent definition adding BoxLabel=" ", does it fix the issue?

I couldn't reproduce your issue of 'no window showing' as I couldn't see how a window is supposed to be shown by your snippets and instructions.

As far as I could come up with, the problem without the suggestion above is that the label appears below the radio button. Like this:
before:


after:


And the 'after' with the solution above was this: