Ok, thanks. I will investigate.
For the future, it would be nice if you could simplify it. I understand it is going to be a problematic to simplify the Ext.NET part (though, it is also possible), but we would appreciate if you could remove, at least, irrelevant to Ext.NET or ExtJS things like:
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
var _gaq = _gaq || [];
_gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-25254525-1']);
_gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);
(function () {
var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true;
ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';
var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);
})();//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"></script>
Hmm, wait a bit, I see that the Ext.onReady script is not so big as it was in the previous pages. You probably simplified it a lot. Nice.
Are you not able to post a standalone ASPX page to reproduce? Well, it is not so comfortable for us to deal with the raw page sources. It takes some time to get it runnable. Commonly, we very seldom request the page sources and, commonly, in quite exceptional occasions. Thank you for understanding.