Sep 01, 2008, 10:01 AM
RE: [FIXED] Load UserControl with Tab + HtmlEditor dinamically
Hi Geoffrey,
Thanks for your reply.
As I mentioned, I did try to put the Panel Collapsed to false, but as far as I can see there will be always an Visibility issue. Because the Panel itself is also inside a Tab which is not active at the first time.
I tried all suggestions to make it HideMode="Offset", but that doesn't work as well.
I rollback my version to 0.5.4 where most problems doesn't happens. I managed to make even the Editor works on version 5.4, but just on IE. On FF, the Editor appears like the image attachment I sent you before with the following message catch by Firebug:
[Exception... "Component returned failure code: 0x80040111 (NS_ERROR_NOT_AVAILABLE)
[nsIDOMNSHTMLdocument.designMode]" nsresult: "0x80040111 (NS_ERROR_NOT_AVAILABLE)"
location: "JS frame :: http://localhost/My-Project/WebResou...58655869900051
:: anonymous :: line 28447" data: no]
http://localhost/My-Project/WebResou...58655869900051
Line 28447
Sys$CultureInfo$_getAbbrMonthIndex("")
No, sorry, unfortunately I could not make a simplier sample, because on simple scenario that problems just doesn't happen. I wish I could remove UpdatePanels, because I don't like the way UpdatePanels do Ajax, but I have no simpliest solution to work with Ajax. Before I was using Anthem and your Coolite AjaxEvents are my hope to remove that UpdatePanels.What I was trying to explain you in my last post is that not even my pages were not been loaded because that 'Operation Aborted' problem. This problem is very critical and doesn't not happen on version 0.5.4.
I'll try to make a simpler sample to reproduce this specific problem, but there are other issues preventing me to update to Coolite version 0.6.0.
When I asked you about the Listener sintax, you told be both ways should work, but that is not true. The way I am doing at the moment with the version 0.5.4 is not valid for version 0.6.0. That is way I asked by a breaking changes documentation. It says that there is no Listener constructor with one argument. But don't worry about it, as long as the other way works, it is fine. I am just giving you feedback.
Ok, I'll chat with you soon.
Leo.